↓ Skip to main content

Biological control of aflatoxin contamination of crops

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological control of aflatoxin contamination of crops
Published in
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, October 2008
DOI 10.1631/jzus.b0860003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan-ni Yin, Lei-yan Yan, Jin-hua Jiang, Zhong-hua Ma

Abstract

Aflatoxins produced primarily by two closely related fungi, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus, are mutagenic and carcinogenic in animals and humans. Of many approaches investigated to manage aflatoxin contamination, biological control method has shown great promise. Numerous organisms, including bacteria, yeasts and nontoxigenic fungal strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus, have been tested for their ability in controlling aflatoxin contamination. Great successes in reducing aflatoxin contamination have been achieved by application of nontoxigenic strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus in fields of cotton, peanut, maize and pistachio. The nontoxigenic strains applied to soil occupy the same niches as the natural occurring toxigenic strains. They, therefore, are capable of competing and displacing toxigenic strains. In this paper, we review recent development in biological control of aflatoxin contamination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 52 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Chemistry 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 56 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,280,777
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#97
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,394
of 101,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.