↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes towards subsequent entry biologics/biosimilars: A survey of Canadian rheumatologists

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attitudes towards subsequent entry biologics/biosimilars: A survey of Canadian rheumatologists
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10067-014-2835-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Grabowski, Bradley Henderson, Dennis Lam, Edward C. Keystone, Carter Thorne, Shahin Jamal, Janet Pope, Boulos Haraoui, Daming Lin, Leigh Revers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,685
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,841
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,049
of 381,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.