You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Starch biosynthetic genes and enzymes are expressed and active in the absence of starch accumulation in sugar beet tap-root
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-14-104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helle Turesson, Mariette Andersson, Salla Marttila, Ingela Thulin, Per Hofvander |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 29% |
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,626,089
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#471
of 3,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,863
of 244,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.