↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating species richness: Biased ecological inference results from spatial heterogeneity in detection probabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating species richness: Biased ecological inference results from spatial heterogeneity in detection probabilities
Published in
Ecological Applications, September 2015
DOI 10.1890/14-1248.1
Authors

Lance B. Mc New, Colleen M. Handel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Finland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Master 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 67%
Environmental Science 14 22%
Unspecified 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,455,850
of 4,748,763 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#677
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,671
of 158,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,748,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.