You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0000000000001098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald E. Low, Derek Alderson, Ivan Cecconello, Andrew C. Chang, Gail E. Darling, Xavier Benoit D'Journo, S. Michael Griffin, Arnulf H. Hölscher, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Blair A. Jobe, Yuko Kitagawa, John C. Kucharczuk, Simon Ying Kit Law, Toni E. Lerut, Nick Maynard, Manuel Pera, Jeffrey H. Peters, C. S. Pramesh, John V. Reynolds, B. Mark Smithers, J. Jan B. van Lanschot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 52% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 376 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 83 | 22% |
| Unknown | 106 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 223 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Unknown | 119 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,377,720
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#825
of 9,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,173
of 279,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#10
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.