↓ Skip to main content

Energy Poverty

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

45 tweeters

Readers on

91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Energy Poverty
Published by
Springer, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69299-9
978-3-31-969299-9, 978-3-31-969298-2

Bouzarovski, Stefan, Stefan Bouzarovski


EVALUATE is a multi-sited study, involving extensive research across a variety of cities and countries. Focusing primarily on four Central and Eastern European cities (Budapest, Gdańsk, Prague and Skopje) the project has undertaken a customized survey with 2435 households, supplemented with insights from in-depth household interviews, ‘energy diaries’ and energy efficiency audits in the homes of approximately 160 households living in the four cities. EVALUATE has entailed 195 expert interviews in a much wider range of sites across the world, as well as an analysis of micro-data from national and European Union surveys of energy poverty. It has led to more than 200 dissemination activities, while laying the basis for the European Energy Poverty Observatory as well as a new European Co-operation for Science and Technology Action on ‘European Energy Poverty: Agenda Co-Creation and Knowledge Innovation’

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 25%
Energy 11 12%
Engineering 8 9%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 22 24%