↓ Skip to main content

Tapentadol extended release in the management of peripheral diabetic neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tapentadol extended release in the management of peripheral diabetic neuropathic pain
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s32193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nalini Vadivelu, Alice Kai, Benjamin Maslin, Gopal Kodumudi, Aron Legler, Jack M Berger

Abstract

Tapentadol, a μ-opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been found to be an effective medication for a wide variety of chronic pain conditions, including back pain, cancer-related pain, and arthritic pain. It has also been found to have fewer gastrointestinal side effects than more traditional opioid-based therapies. More recently, tapentadol extended release has been demonstrated to be effective in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy, an often debilitating condition affecting approximately one-third of all patients with diabetes. This review highlights the most up-to-date basic and clinical studies by focusing on the mechanisms of action of tapentadol and its clinical efficacy, especially with regard to painful diabetic neuropathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Unspecified 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,528,938
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#317
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,452
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.