↓ Skip to main content

Measles Outbreak in South Africa: Epidemiology of Laboratory-Confirmed Measles Cases and Assessment of Intervention, 2009–2011

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measles Outbreak in South Africa: Epidemiology of Laboratory-Confirmed Measles Cases and Assessment of Intervention, 2009–2011
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genevie M. Ntshoe, Johanna M. McAnerney, Brett N. Archer, Sheilagh B. Smit, Bernice N. Harris, Stefano Tempia, Mirriam Mashele, Beverley Singh, Juno Thomas, Ayanda Cengimbo, Lucille H. Blumberg, Adrian Puren, Jocelyn Moyes, Johann van den Heever, Barry D. Schoub, Cheryl Cohen

Abstract

Since 1995, measles vaccination at nine and 18 months has been routine in South Africa; however, coverage seldom reached >95%. We describe the epidemiology of laboratory-confirmed measles case-patients and assess the impact of the nationwide mass vaccination campaign during the 2009 to 2011 measles outbreak in South Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 24%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,696,827
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#67,886
of 201,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,578
of 194,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,285
of 5,393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.