You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adjuvant Therapy in Lymph Node–Positive Vulvar Cancer: The AGO-CaRE-1 Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1093/jnci/dju426 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sven Mahner, Julia Jueckstock, Felix Hilpert, Petra Neuser, Philipp Harter, Nikolaus de Gregorio, Annette Hasenburg, Jalid Sehouli, Annika Habermann, Peter Hillemanns, Sophie Fuerst, Hans-Georg Strauss, Klaus Baumann, Falk Thiel, Alexander Mustea, Werner Meier, Andreas du Bois, Lis-Femke Griebel, Linn Woelber, for the AGO-CaRE 1 investigators |
Abstract |
Women with node-positive vulvar cancer have a high risk for disease recurrence. Indication criteria for adjuvant radiotherapy are controversial. This study was designed to further understand the role of adjuvant therapy in node-positive disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 22% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 16% |
Other | 19 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Other | 30 | 23% |
Unknown | 19 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 64% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,550,850
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#989
of 7,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,637
of 361,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#21
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.