You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early exercise after spinal cord injury (‘Switch-On’): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-16-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary P Galea, Sarah A Dunlop, Ruth Marshall, Jillian Clark, Leonid Churilov |
| Abstract |
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to a profound muscular atrophy, bone loss and bone fragility. While there is evidence that exercising paralysed muscles may lead to reversal of muscle atrophy in the chronic period after SCI, there is little evidence that exercise can prevent muscle changes early after injury. Moreover, whether exercise can prevent bone loss and microarchitectural decay is not clear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 7% |
| Engineering | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2015.
All research outputs
#23,319,379
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#39
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,415
of 361,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#28
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.