↓ Skip to main content

Macrolides for diffuse panbronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macrolides for diffuse panbronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007716.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiufang Lin, Jing Lu, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Hong Mei Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 33%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,022,268
of 14,465,534 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,903
of 10,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,908
of 282,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#176
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,465,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.