↓ Skip to main content

Single gene microdeletions and microduplication of 3p26.3 in three unrelated families: CNTN6 as a new candidate gene for intellectual disability

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single gene microdeletions and microduplication of 3p26.3 in three unrelated families: CNTN6 as a new candidate gene for intellectual disability
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13039-014-0097-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna A Kashevarova, Lyudmila P Nazarenko, Soren Schultz-Pedersen, Nikolay A Skryabin, Olga A Salyukova, Nataliya N Chechetkina, Ekaterina N Tolmacheva, Aleksey A Rudko, Pamela Magini, Claudio Graziano, Giovanni Romeo, Shelagh Joss, Zeynep Tümer, Igor N Lebedev

Abstract

Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal alterations in patients with a idiopathic intellectual disability (ID) allows significant improvement in delineation of the regions of the genome that are associated with brain development and function. However, these chromosomal regions usually contain several protein-coding genes and regulatory elements, complicating the understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations. We report two siblings with ID and an unrelated patient with atypical autism who had 3p26.3 microdeletions and one intellectually disabled patient with a 3p26.3 microduplication encompassing only the CNTN6 gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Unspecified 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Unspecified 8 11%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,251,039
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#297
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,061
of 352,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.