You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Priming healthy eating. You can't prime all the people all of the time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Appetite, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanna E. Forwood, Amy L. Ahern, Gareth J. Hollands, Yin-Lam Ng, Theresa M. Marteau |
| Abstract |
In the context of a food purchasing environment filled with advertising and promotions, and an increased desire from policy makers to guide individuals toward choosing healthier foods, this study tests whether priming methods that use healthy food adverts to increase preference for healthier food generalize to a representative population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| Canada | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 60 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,267,349
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#1,246
of 4,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,065
of 360,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#23
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.