↓ Skip to main content

Coactive Vicarious Learning: Toward a Relational Theory of Vicarious Learning in Organizations

Overview of attention for article published in Academy of Management Review, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coactive Vicarious Learning: Toward a Relational Theory of Vicarious Learning in Organizations
Published in
Academy of Management Review, October 2018
DOI 10.5465/amr.2016.0202
Authors

Christopher G. Myers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nicaragua 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 48 48%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#943,732
of 14,998,885 outputs
Outputs from Academy of Management Review
#81
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,324
of 401,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academy of Management Review
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,998,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.