↓ Skip to main content

Coactive Vicarious Learning: Toward a Relational Theory of Vicarious Learning in Organizations

Overview of attention for article published in Academy of Management Review, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coactive Vicarious Learning: Toward a Relational Theory of Vicarious Learning in Organizations
Published in
Academy of Management Review, October 2018
DOI 10.5465/amr.2016.0202
Authors

Christopher G. Myers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nicaragua 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 18 51%
Social Sciences 7 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,402,492
of 12,371,547 outputs
Outputs from Academy of Management Review
#232
of 638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,126
of 350,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academy of Management Review
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,371,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.