↓ Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary collaboration in the provision of a pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation service at an Irish teaching hospital

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interdisciplinary collaboration in the provision of a pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation service at an Irish teaching hospital
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11096-014-0059-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre M. Holland

Abstract

Background Medication reconciliation is a basic principle of good medicines management. With the establishment of the National Acute Medicines Programme in Ireland, medication reconciliation has been mandated for all patients at all transitions of care. The clinical pharmacist is widely credited as the healthcare professional that plays the most critical role in the provision of medication reconciliation services. Objectives To determine the feasibility of the clinical pharmacist working with the hospital doctor, in a collaborative fashion, to improve the completeness and accuracy of discharge prescriptions through the provision of a pharmacist led discharge medication reconciliation service. Setting 243-bed acute teaching hospital of Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Method Cross-sectional observational study of discharge prescriptions identified using non-probability consecutive sampling. Discharge medication reconciliation was provided by the clinical pharmacist. Non-reconciliations were communicated verbally to the doctor, and documented in the patient's medical notes as appropriate. The pharmacist and/or doctor resolved the discrepancies according to predetermined guidelines. Main outcome measures Number and type of discharge medication non-reconciliations, and acceptance of interventions made by the clinical pharmacist in their resolution. Number of discharge medication non-reconciliations requiring specific input of the hospital doctor. Results In total, the discharge prescriptions of 224 patients, involving 2,245 medications were included in the study. Prescription non-reconciliation was identified for 62.5 % (n = 140) of prescriptions and 15.8 % (n = 355) of medications, while communication non-reconciliation was identified for 92 % (n = 206) of prescriptions and 45.8 % (n = 1,029) of medications. Omission of preadmission medications (76.6 %, n = 272) and new medication non-reconciliations (58.5 %, n = 602) were the most common type. Prescription non-reconciliations were fully resolved on 55.7 % (n = 78) of prescriptions prior to discharge; 67.9 % (n = 53) by the doctor, 26.9 % (n = 21) by the clinical pharmacist, and 5.2 % (n = 4) by the joint input of doctor and pharmacist. All communication non-reconciliations were resolved prior to discharge; 97.1 % (n = 200) by the pharmacist, and 2.9 % (n = 6) by both doctor and pharmacist. Conclusion This study demonstrates how interdisciplinary collaboration, between the clinical pharmacist and hospital doctor, can improve the completeness and accuracy of discharge prescriptions through the provision of a pharmacist led discharge medication reconciliation service at an Irish teaching hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,726,941
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#361
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,607
of 352,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.