↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Tumor Cell Growth Inhibitors by Combinatorial Chemistry and Zebrafish Assays

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying Tumor Cell Growth Inhibitors by Combinatorial Chemistry and Zebrafish Assays
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xiang, Hongbo Yang, Chao Che, Haixia Zou, Hanshuo Yang, Yuquan Wei, Junmin Quan, Hui Zhang, Zhen Yang, Shuo Lin

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) play important roles in regulating cell cycle progression, and altered cell cycles resulting from over-expression or abnormal activation of CDKs observed in many human cancers. As a result, CDKs have become extensive studied targets for developing chemical inhibitors for cancer therapies; however, protein kinases share a highly conserved ATP binding pocket at which most chemical inhibitors bind, therefore, a major challenge in developing kinase inhibitors is achieving target selectivity. To identify cell growth inhibitors with potential applications in cancer therapy, we used an integrated approach that combines one-pot chemical synthesis in a combinatorial manner to generate diversified small molecules with new chemical scaffolds coupled with growth inhibition assay using developing zebrafish embryos. We report the successful identification of a novel lead compound that displays selective inhibitory effects on CDK2 activity, cancer cell proliferation, and tumor progression in vivo. Our approaches should have general applications in developing cell proliferation inhibitors using an efficient combinatorial chemical genetic method and integrated biological assays. The novel cell growth inhibitor we identified should have potential as a cancer therapeutic agent.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Chemistry 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,694,135
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,046
of 194,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,715
of 170,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#201
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.