↓ Skip to main content

Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
530 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
648 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000335.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Hayden, Maurits W van Tulder, Antti Malmivaara, Bart W Koes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 624 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 111 17%
Student > Bachelor 92 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 7%
Student > Postgraduate 44 7%
Other 42 6%
Other 133 21%
Unknown 178 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 214 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 14%
Sports and Recreations 41 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 3%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Other 63 10%
Unknown 204 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#526,926
of 14,733,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,481
of 11,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,105
of 281,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,733,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.