↓ Skip to main content

Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000335.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Hayden, Maurits W van Tulder, Antti Malmivaara, Bart W Koes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 1%
United States 7 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 565 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 130 22%
Student > Bachelor 87 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 11%
Researcher 64 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 9%
Other 204 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 281 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 100 17%
Unspecified 70 12%
Sports and Recreations 52 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 4%
Other 76 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#392,647
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,171
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,331
of 272,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.