The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Smiles, Apologies, and Drawing Trauma-Informed Care in the PurpLE Clinic
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.1.mnar1-1801 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anita Ravi |
Abstract |
This medical narrative highlights ways in which comics reflect the author's experience as a primary care physician striving to offer sensitive care to people who have experienced sexual violence. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 36 | 36% |
Spain | 7 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
Canada | 4 | 4% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
Paraguay | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 66 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 19% |
Scientists | 8 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#685,769
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#170
of 2,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,012
of 456,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.