↓ Skip to main content

Altered radiation fractionation schedules for clinically localised and locally advanced prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered radiation fractionation schedules for clinically localised and locally advanced prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011462
Authors

Feng-Yi Soh, Melissa L James, Brigid E Hickey, Tiffany Daly, Mark Jeffery, Adrienne M See, Daniel P Francis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,188,548
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,286
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,613
of 273,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#189
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.