↓ Skip to main content

Altered radiation fractionation schedules for clinically localised and locally advanced prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered radiation fractionation schedules for clinically localised and locally advanced prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011462
Authors

Feng-Yi Soh, Melissa L James, Brigid E Hickey, Tiffany Daly, Mark Jeffery, Adrienne M See, Daniel P Francis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,741,704
of 6,348,103 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,989
of 7,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,035
of 197,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,348,103 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.