↓ Skip to main content

Positive Regulation of TRAF6-Dependent Innate Immune Responses by Protein Phosphatase PP1-γ

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Positive Regulation of TRAF6-Dependent Innate Immune Responses by Protein Phosphatase PP1-γ
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0089284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda M. Opaluch, Monika Schneider, Chih-yuan Chiang, Quy T. Nguyen, Ana M. Maestre, Lubbertus C. F. Mulder, Ismael Secundino, Paul D. De Jesus, Renate König, Viviana Simon, Victor Nizet, Graham MacLeod, Susannah Varmuza, Ana Fernandez-Sesma, Sumit K. Chanda

Abstract

Innate immune sensors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) differentially utilize adaptor proteins and additional molecular mediators to ensure robust and precise immune responses to pathogen challenge. Through a gain-of-function genetic screen, we identified the gamma catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1-γ) as a positive regulator of MyD88-dependent proinflammatory innate immune activation. PP1-γ physically interacts with the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF6, and enhances the activity of TRAF6 towards itself and substrates such as IKKγ, whereas enzymatically inactive PP1-γ represses these events. Importantly, these activities were found to be critical for cellular innate responses to pathogen challenge and microbial clearance in both mouse macrophages and human monocyte lines. These data indicate that PP1-γ phosphatase activity regulates overall TRAF6 E3 ubiquitin ligase function and promotes NF-κB-mediated innate signaling responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 32%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,251,039
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,506
of 194,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,953
of 224,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5,028
of 5,783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.