↓ Skip to main content

Ion Channel Gene Expression in the Inner Ear

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 429)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ion Channel Gene Expression in the Inner Ear
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10162-007-0082-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene S. Gabashvili, Bernd H. A. Sokolowski, Cynthia C. Morton, Anne B. S. Giersch

Abstract

The ion channel genome is still being defined despite numerous publications on the subject. The ion channel transcriptome is even more difficult to assess. Using high-throughput computational tools, we surveyed all available inner ear cDNA libraries to identify genes coding for ion channels. We mapped over 100,000 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) derived from human cochlea, mouse organ of Corti, mouse and zebrafish inner ear, and rat vestibular end organs to Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Danio rerio, and Rattus norvegicus genomes. A survey of EST data alone reveals that at least a third of the ion channel genome is expressed in the inner ear, with highest expression occurring in hair cell-enriched mouse organ of Corti and rat vestibule. Our data and comparisons with other experimental techniques that measure gene expression show that every method has its limitations and does not per se provide a complete coverage of the inner ear ion channelome. In addition, the data show that most genes produce alternative transcripts with the same spectrum across multiple organisms, no ion channel gene variants are unique to the inner ear, and many splice variants have yet to be annotated. Our high-throughput approach offers a qualitative computational and experimental analysis of ion channel genes in inner ear cDNA collections. A lack of data and incomplete gene annotations prevent both rigorous statistical analyses and comparisons of entire ion channelomes derived from different tissues and organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 30%
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,426,857
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#47
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,221
of 71,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them