↓ Skip to main content

Nonpolar Resistive Switching in Ag@TiO2 Core–Shell Nanowires

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonpolar Resistive Switching in Ag@TiO2 Core–Shell Nanowires
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, October 2017
DOI 10.1021/acsami.7b10666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh G. Manning, Subhajit Biswas, Justin D. Holmes, John J. Boland

Abstract

Nonpolar resistive switching, a combination of bipolar and unipolar resistive switching, is demonstrated for the first time in a single nanowire system. Exploiting Ag@TiO2 core-shell nanowires synthesized by post-growth shell formation the switching mode is controlled by adjusting the current compliance effectively tailoring the electrical polarity response.. We demonstrate ON/OFF ratios of 10(5) and 10(7) for bipolar and unipolar modes respectively. In the bipolar regime, retention times could be controlled up to 10(3) s and in unipolar mode > 10(6) s were recorded. We show how the unique dual-mode switching behavior is enabled by the defect rich polycrystalline material structure of the TiO2 shell and the interaction between the Ag core and the Ag electrodes. These results provide a foundation for engineering nonpolar resistive switching behaviors for memory storage and neuromorphic applications in core-shell nanowire structures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 14 37%
Physics and Astronomy 7 18%
Engineering 6 16%
Chemistry 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#11,886,454
of 21,075,379 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#5,887
of 15,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,209
of 440,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#142
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,075,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.