↓ Skip to main content

Herbal medicines for treating HIV infection and AIDS

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Herbal medicines for treating HIV infection and AIDS
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003937.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Eric Manheimer, Min Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Psychology 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 36 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,605,115
of 15,329,269 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,163
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,368
of 287,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.