↓ Skip to main content

Funding illness prevention and health promotion in Australia: a way forward

Overview of attention for article published in Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Funding illness prevention and health promotion in Australia: a way forward
Published in
Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1743-8462-6-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Harris, Duncan Mortimer

Abstract

Unlike pharmaceuticals and private medical services there is no single source of funding for illness prevention and health promotion and no systematic process for setting priorities in public health. There is a need to improve the efficiency of access to health funding across prevention and treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Computer Science 2 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,667,492
of 15,490,852 outputs
Outputs from Australia and New Zealand Health Policy
#15
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,088
of 289,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australia and New Zealand Health Policy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,490,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them