The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
<sup>18</sup>F‐FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010632.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadja Smailagic<sup>a</sup>, Marco Vacante, Chris Hyde, Steven Martin, Obioha Ukoumunne, Christos Sachpekidis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 408 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 13% |
| Researcher | 48 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 135 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 21% |
| Psychology | 29 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 72 | 18% |
| Unknown | 156 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,587,697
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,869
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,757
of 364,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#190
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.