↓ Skip to main content

Ten simple rules for drawing scientific comics

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 5,923)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
807 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten simple rules for drawing scientific comics
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason E. McDermott, Matthew Partridge, Yana Bromberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 807 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 567. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#16,254
of 15,142,318 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#15
of 5,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#823
of 403,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,142,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.