↓ Skip to main content

Niobium for Steelmaking

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgist, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Niobium for Steelmaking
Published in
Metallurgist, November 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1014897029026
Authors

Zh. Patel, K. Khul'ka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 55%
Chemical Engineering 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Materials Science 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgist
#8
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,661
of 45,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgist
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them