You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beverley Shea, Maarten Boers, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Candyce Hamel, Lex M Bouter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Librarian | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 41% |
| Psychology | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |