↓ Skip to main content

Using Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein quaternary structure: a sequence-segmented PseAAC approach

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein quaternary structure: a sequence-segmented PseAAC approach
Published in
Amino Acids, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00726-008-0086-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shao-Wu Zhang, Wei Chen, Feng Yang, Quan Pan

Abstract

In the protein universe, many proteins are composed of two or more polypeptide chains, generally referred to as subunits, which associate through noncovalent interactions and, occasionally, disulfide bonds to form protein quaternary structures. It has long been known that the functions of proteins are closely related to their quaternary structures; some examples include enzymes, hemoglobin, DNA polymerase, and ion channels. However, it is extremely labor-expensive and even impossible to quickly determine the structures of hundreds of thousands of protein sequences solely from experiments. Since the number of protein sequences entering databanks is increasing rapidly, it is highly desirable to develop computational methods for classifying the quaternary structures of proteins from their primary sequences. Since the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC) was introduced, a variety of approaches, such as residue conservation scores, von Neumann entropy, multiscale energy, autocorrelation function, moment descriptors, and cellular automata, have been utilized to formulate the PseAAC for predicting different attributes of proteins. Here, in a different approach, a sequence-segmented PseAAC is introduced to represent protein samples. Meanwhile, multiclass SVM classifier modules were adopted to classify protein quaternary structures. As a demonstration, the dataset constructed by Chou and Cai [(2003) Proteins 53:282-289] was adopted as a benchmark dataset. The overall jackknife success rates thus obtained were 88.2-89.1%, indicating that the new approach is quite promising for predicting protein quaternary structure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 25%
Chemistry 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#495
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,274
of 81,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.