↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006853.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Jan Schoones, Els CHM Van den Ende

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 255 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 25%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 65 24%
Unknown 27 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Sports and Recreations 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 39 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,292,305
of 14,189,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,076
of 10,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,548
of 282,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,189,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.