↓ Skip to main content

Carotenoid metabolism strengthens the link between feather coloration and individual quality

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
41 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carotenoid metabolism strengthens the link between feather coloration and individual quality
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02649-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan J. Weaver, Eduardo S. A. Santos, Anna M. Tucker, Alan E. Wilson, Geoffrey E. Hill

Abstract

Thirty years of research has made carotenoid coloration a textbook example of an honest signal of individual quality, but tests of this idea are surprisingly inconsistent. Here, to investigate sources of this heterogeneity, we perform meta-analyses of published studies on the relationship between carotenoid-based feather coloration and measures of individual quality. To create color displays, animals use either carotenoids unchanged from dietary components or carotenoids that they biochemically convert before deposition. We hypothesize that converted carotenoids better reflect individual quality because of the physiological links between cellular function and carotenoid metabolism. We show that feather coloration is an honest signal of some, but not all, measures of quality. Where these relationships exist, we show that converted, but not dietary, carotenoid coloration drives the relationship. Our results have broad implications for understanding the evolutionary role of carotenoid coloration and the physiological mechanisms that maintain signal honesty of animal ornamental traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 15%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 62 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Environmental Science 13 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 71 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#650,344
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#11,237
of 57,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,003
of 450,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#283
of 1,242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.