↓ Skip to main content

Blonanserin

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blonanserin
Published in
CNS Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11202620-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma D. Deeks, Gillian M. Keating

Abstract

Oral blonanserin (Lonasen) is an atypical antipsychotic agent indicated for use in patients with schizophrenia in Japan and Korea. It is effective in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, providing short- and long-term efficacy against both the positive and negative symptoms of the disorder in several randomized and noncomparative trials. Notably, in two randomized, double-blind trials of 8 weeks' duration, blonanserin was noninferior to haloperidol or risperidone for primary endpoints, although it appeared to be better than haloperidol in improving negative symptoms. Blonanserin is generally well tolerated and appears to have an acceptable profile in terms of bodyweight gain. Potential tolerability benefits of the drug in short-term trials included fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than haloperidol and fewer reports of prolactin level increases or hyperprolactinaemia than risperidone. Nevertheless, extrapyramidal symptoms and hyperprolactinaemia were among the most common adverse reactions associated with blonanserin in noncomparative long-term studies. Further prospective and long-term comparative studies are required in order to definitively position blonanserin with respect to other antipsychotic agents. In the meantime, available clinical data suggest that blonanserin is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the short-term treatment of schizophrenia and for those requiring longer-term therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Psychology 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#768
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,270
of 187,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#275
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.