↓ Skip to main content

Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hajo Wildschut, Marieke I Both, Suzanne Medema, Eeke Thomee, Mark F Wildhagen, Nathalie Kapp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 18 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,669,340
of 15,543,024 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,085
of 11,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,459
of 289,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#153
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,543,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.