You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phylogenomics Reshuffles the Eukaryotic Supergroups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabien Burki, Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi, Marianne Minge, Åsmund Skjæveland, Sergey I. Nikolaev, Kjetill S. Jakobsen, Jan Pawlowski |
| Abstract |
Resolving the phylogenetic relationships between eukaryotes is an ongoing challenge of evolutionary biology. In recent years, the accumulation of molecular data led to a new evolutionary understanding, in which all eukaryotic diversity has been classified into five or six supergroups. Yet, the composition of these large assemblages and their relationships remain controversial. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 355 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Professor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 215 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 62 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,741,906
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,342
of 201,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,156
of 69,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#138
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.