You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
丸山ワクチンの作用機序について
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1272/manms.13.140 |
Authors |
高橋 秀実 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,623,128
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi
#5
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,987
of 432,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them