You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Determining direct binders of the Androgen Receptor using a high-throughput Cellular Thermal Shift Assay
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-18650-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph Shaw, Mathew Leveridge, Charlotta Norling, Jakob Karén, Daniel Martinez Molina, Daniel O’Neill, James E. Dowling, Paul Davey, Suzanna Cowan, Michael Dabrowski, Martin Main, Davide Gianni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 40% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 30% |
Chemistry | 14 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,448,677
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#21,669
of 142,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,668
of 457,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#643
of 4,122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.