You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison M Hutchinson, Doris L Milke, Suzanne Maisey, Cynthia Johnson, Janet E Squires, Gary Teare, Carole A Estabrooks |
| Abstract |
The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 is designed to collect the minimum amount of data to guide care planning and monitoring for residents in long-term care settings. These data have been used to compute indicators of care quality. Use of the quality indicators to inform quality improvement initiatives is contingent upon the validity and reliability of the indicators. The purpose of this review was to systematically examine published and grey research reports in order to assess the state of the science regarding the validity and reliability of the RAI-MDS 2.0 Quality Indicators (QIs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,697,083
of 23,325,355 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,704
of 7,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,630
of 84,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#37
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,325,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.