↓ Skip to main content

At the Crossroads of Conspicuous and Concealable: What Race Categories Communicate about Sexual Orientation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
At the Crossroads of Conspicuous and Concealable: What Race Categories Communicate about Sexual Orientation
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerri L. Johnson, Negin Ghavami

Abstract

We found that judgments of a perceptually ambiguous social category, sexual orientation, varied as a function of a perceptually obvious social category, race. Sexual orientation judgments tend to exploit a heuristic of gender inversion that often promotes accuracy. We predicted that an orthogonal social category that is itself gendered, race, would impact both sexual orientation categorizations and their accuracy. Importantly, overlaps in both the phenotypes and stereotypes associated with specific race and sex categories (e.g., the categories Black and Men and the categories Asian and Women) lead race categories to be decidedly gendered. Therefore, we reasoned that race categories would bias judgments of sexual orientation and their accuracy because of the inherent gendered nature. Indeed, both gay and straight perceivers in the United States were more likely to judge targets to be gay when target race was associated with gender-atypical stereotypes or phenotypes (e.g., Asian Men). Perceivers were also most accurate when judging the sexual orientation of the most strongly gender-stereotyped groups (i.e., Asian Women and Black Men), but least accurate when judging the sexual orientation of counter-stereotypical groups (i.e., Asian men and Black Women). Signal detection analyses confirmed that this pattern of accuracy was achieved because of heightened sensitivity to cues in groups who more naturally conform to gendered stereotypes (Asian Women and Black Men). Implications for social perception are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 31%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 61%
Social Sciences 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,678,279
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,625
of 199,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,791
of 110,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#705
of 1,449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.