↓ Skip to main content

The Subtlety of Sex-Atypicality

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Subtlety of Sex-Atypicality
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1002002420159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P. Dunne, J. Michael Bailey, Katherine M. Kirk, Nicholas G. Martin

Abstract

Memories of sex-atypical behavior and interests in childhood usually differ between homosexual and heterosexual people. However, variation within these broad groups has not previously been explored in detail, especially among women. We utilized data from a postal survey of a nationwide sample of Australian adult twins (n = 4,901, age range: 19-52 years). Among men, 15.2% reported homosexual behavior (ever), 11.5% said they had been sexually attracted to the same sex, and 6.4% said they were not heterosexual; the corresponding figures for women were 7.9, 10.6, and 3.5%. A continuous measure of childhood gender nonconformity (CGN) was sensitive to slight variations in homosexual attraction and behavior. In particular, among both men and women who identified as heterosexual, there were significant differences between "complete" heterosexuals and those who admitted to only one or a few same-sex behaviors but no homosexual attraction. Among men, CGN scores distinguished between heterosexuals who admitted to same-sex behavior only and those who admitted to some homosexual attraction. The sexual subgroups also differed on a measure of gender atypicality in adulthood. Implications for developmental theories of sexuality are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 8%
Sweden 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 50%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,362
of 3,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,158
of 114,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.