You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of Potential Therapeutic Drugs for Huntington's Disease using Caenorhabditis elegans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cindy Voisine, Hemant Varma, Nicola Walker, Emily A. Bates, Brent R. Stockwell, Anne C. Hart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 22% |
| Researcher | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2012.
All research outputs
#4,694,486
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,091
of 194,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,189
of 70,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.