Title |
Surveillance of vector-borne pathogens under imperfect detection: lessons from Chagas disease risk (mis)measurement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-18532-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thaís Tâmara Castro Minuzzi-Souza, Nadjar Nitz, César Augusto Cuba Cuba, Luciana Hagström, Mariana Machado Hecht, Camila Santana, Marcelle Ribeiro, Tamires Emanuele Vital, Marcelo Santalucia, Monique Knox, Marcos Takashi Obara, Fernando Abad-Franch, Rodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves |
Abstract |
Vector-borne pathogens threaten human health worldwide. Despite their critical role in disease prevention, routine surveillance systems often rely on low-complexity pathogen detection tests of uncertain accuracy. In Chagas disease surveillance, optical microscopy (OM) is routinely used for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi in its vectors. Here, we use replicate T. cruzi detection data and hierarchical site-occupancy models to assess the reliability of OM-based T. cruzi surveillance while explicitly accounting for false-negative and false-positive results. We investigated 841 triatomines with OM slides (1194 fresh, 1192 Giemsa-stained) plus conventional (cPCR, 841 assays) and quantitative PCR (qPCR, 1682 assays). Detections were considered unambiguous only when parasitologists unmistakably identified T. cruzi in Giemsa-stained slides. qPCR was >99% sensitive and specific, whereas cPCR was ~100% specific but only ~55% sensitive. In routine surveillance, examination of a single OM slide per vector missed ~50-75% of infections and wrongly scored as infected ~7% of the bugs. qPCR-based and model-based infection frequency estimates were nearly three times higher, on average, than OM-based indices. We conclude that the risk of vector-borne Chagas disease may be substantially higher than routine surveillance data suggest. The hierarchical modelling approach we illustrate can help enhance vector-borne disease surveillance systems when pathogen detection is imperfect. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Ecuador | 1 | 14% |
Argentina | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 31% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 43% |