↓ Skip to main content

Exposed subsurface ice sheets in the Martian mid-latitudes

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
165 news outlets
blogs
24 blogs
twitter
254 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exposed subsurface ice sheets in the Martian mid-latitudes
Published in
Science, January 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aao1619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin M. Dundas, Ali M. Bramson, Lujendra Ojha, James J. Wray, Michael T. Mellon, Shane Byrne, Alfred S. McEwen, Nathaniel E. Putzig, Donna Viola, Sarah Sutton, Erin Clark, John W. Holt

Abstract

Thick deposits cover broad regions of the Martian mid-latitudes with a smooth mantle; erosion in these regions creates scarps that expose the internal structure of the mantle. We investigated eight of these locations and found that they expose deposits of water ice that can be >100 meters thick, extending downward from depths as shallow as 1 to 2 meters below the surface. The scarps are actively retreating because of sublimation of the exposed water ice. The ice deposits likely originated as snowfall during Mars' high-obliquity periods and have now compacted into massive, fractured, and layered ice. We expect the vertical structure of Martian ice-rich deposits to preserve a record of ice deposition and past climate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 254 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 25%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 61 40%
Physics and Astronomy 22 14%
Engineering 8 5%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Chemistry 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1665. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,589
of 16,283,062 outputs
Outputs from Science
#180
of 68,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85
of 410,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#10
of 981 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,283,062 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 981 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.