↓ Skip to main content

Exposed subsurface ice sheets in the Martian mid-latitudes

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
165 news outlets
blogs
24 blogs
twitter
256 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exposed subsurface ice sheets in the Martian mid-latitudes
Published in
Science, January 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aao1619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin M. Dundas, Ali M. Bramson, Lujendra Ojha, James J. Wray, Michael T. Mellon, Shane Byrne, Alfred S. McEwen, Nathaniel E. Putzig, Donna Viola, Sarah Sutton, Erin Clark, John W. Holt

Abstract

Thick deposits cover broad regions of the Martian mid-latitudes with a smooth mantle; erosion in these regions creates scarps that expose the internal structure of the mantle. We investigated eight of these locations and found that they expose deposits of water ice that can be >100 meters thick, extending downward from depths as shallow as 1 to 2 meters below the surface. The scarps are actively retreating because of sublimation of the exposed water ice. The ice deposits likely originated as snowfall during Mars' high-obliquity periods and have now compacted into massive, fractured, and layered ice. We expect the vertical structure of Martian ice-rich deposits to preserve a record of ice deposition and past climate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 27%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 72 39%
Physics and Astronomy 24 13%
Chemistry 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 39 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1668. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,547
of 21,175,128 outputs
Outputs from Science
#278
of 76,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99
of 440,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#12
of 988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,175,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.