You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EEF2 Analysis Challenges the Monophyly of Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002621 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eunsoo Kim, Linda E. Graham |
| Abstract |
Classification of eukaryotes provides a fundamental phylogenetic framework for ecological, medical, and industrial research. In recent years eukaryotes have been classified into six major supergroups: Amoebozoa, Archaeplastida, Chromalveolata, Excavata, Opisthokonta, and Rhizaria. According to this supergroup classification, Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata each arose from a single plastid-generating endosymbiotic event involving a cyanobacterium (Archaeplastida) or red alga (Chromalveolata). Although the plastids within members of the Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata share some features, no nucleocytoplasmic synapomorphies supporting these supergroups are currently known. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,741,906
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,342
of 201,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,139
of 82,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#296
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.