↓ Skip to main content

SVCT1 and SVCT2: key proteins for vitamin C uptake

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SVCT1 and SVCT2: key proteins for vitamin C uptake
Published in
Amino Acids, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00726-007-0555-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Savini, A. Rossi, C. Pierro, L. Avigliano, M. V. Catani

Abstract

Vitamin C is accumulated in mammalian cells by two types of proteins: sodium-ascorbate co-transporters (SVCTs) and hexose transporters (GLUTs); in particular, SVCTs actively import ascorbate, the reduced form of this vitamin. SVCTs are surface glycoproteins encoded by two different genes, very similar in structure. They show distinct tissue distribution and functional characteristics, which indicate different physiological roles. SVCT1 is involved in whole-body homeostasis of vitamin C, while SVCT2 protects metabolically active cells against oxidative stress. Regulation at mRNA or protein level may serve for preferential accumulation of ascorbic acid at sites where it is needed. This review will summarize the present knowledge on structure, function and regulation of the SVCT transporters. Understanding the physiological role of SVCT1 and SVCT2 may lead to develop new therapeutic strategies to control intracellular vitamin C content or to promote tissue-specific delivery of vitamin C-drug conjugates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
Unknown 250 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Master 32 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 60 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Chemistry 9 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 66 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,896,740
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#272
of 1,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,334
of 83,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.