↓ Skip to main content

Signal Detection for Recently Approved Products: Adapting and Evaluating Self-Controlled Case Series Method Using a US Claims and UK Electronic Medical Records Database

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signal Detection for Recently Approved Products: Adapting and Evaluating Self-Controlled Case Series Method Using a US Claims and UK Electronic Medical Records Database
Published in
Drug Safety, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40264-017-0626-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaofeng Zhou, Ian. J. Douglas, Rongjun. Shen, Andrew. Bate

Abstract

The Self-Controlled Case Series (SCCS) method has been widely used for hypothesis testing, but there is limited evidence of its performance for safety signal detection. The objective of this study was to evaluate SCCS for signal detection on recently approved products. A retrospective study covered the period after three recently marketed drugs were launched through to 31 December 2010 using The Health Improvement Network, a UK primary care database, and Optum, a US claims database. The SCCS method was applied to examine five heterogenous outcomes with desvenlafaxine and escitalopram and six outcomes with adalimumab for Signals of Disproportional Recording (SDRs); a positive finding was determined to be when the lower bound of 95% Confidence Interval of the incidence rate ratio (IRR) estimate was >  1. Multiple design choices were tested and the trend in IRR estimates over calendar time for one drug event pair was examined. All six outcomes with adalimumab, three of five outcomes with desvenlafaxine, and four of five outcomes with escitalopram had SDRs. SCCS highlighted all acute events in the primary analysis but was less successful with slower-onset outcomes. Performance varied by risk period definition. Changes in IRR estimates over quarterly intervals for adalimumab with herpes zoster showed marked higher SDR within 9 months of drug launch. SCCS shows promise for signal detection: it may highlight known associations for recent marketed products and has potential for early signal identification. SCCS performance varied by design choice and the nature of both exposure and event pair. Future work is needed to determine how effective the approach is in prospective testing and determining the performance characteristics of the approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 38%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,583,054
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#1,527
of 1,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,586
of 443,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.