You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Silver Products for Medical Indications: Risk-Benefit Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Toxicology (15563650), September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3109/15563659609020246 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Man C. Fung, Debra L. Bowen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 17 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#800,671
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#104
of 2,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,658
of 99,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#5
of 684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.