↓ Skip to main content

House dust mite control measures for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
House dust mite control measures for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001187.pub3

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2008.
All research outputs
#983,634
of 4,478,505 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,868
of 7,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,039
of 148,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,478,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.