↓ Skip to main content

Dipsogenic diabetes insipidus: report of a novel treatment strategy and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dipsogenic diabetes insipidus: report of a novel treatment strategy and literature review
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10157-005-0397-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert M. Perkins, Christina M. Yuan, Paul G. Welch

Abstract

Dipsogenic diabetes insipidus is a syndrome of disordered thirst, in patients without psychiatric disease, which may be confused with partial central diabetes insipidus. Distinguishing these entities involves monitored water testing. Therapy with antidiuretic hormone in patients with dipsogenic diabetes insipidus is thought to be contraindicated for fear of inducing water intoxication. We report a case of a 26-year-old woman without psychiatric illness referred for longstanding polyuria and polydipsia. Otherwise healthy, she complained of near-constant thirst and frequent urination, causing severe disruption of her personal and professional life. She had been consistently eunatremic and polyuric, with low urine osmolality. Results of extensive water testing revealed intact urinary concentrating and diluting capacity, physiologic though blunted antidiuretic hormone (ADH) release, and an abnormally low thirst threshold, consistent with the diagnosis of dipsogenic diabetes insipidus. To control her polyuria we initiated treatment with intermittent, low-dose, intranasal desmopressin and strict water restriction during drug dosing. In follow-up she reported excellent control of polyuria and significant functional improvement. The reviewed literature demonstrates a limited number of reports about dipsogenic diabetes insipidus, and no prior report of a similar treatment strategy. Dipsogenic diabetes insipidus is an uncommonly (and not universally) recognized disorder, requiring monitored testing in order to distinguish it from incomplete forms of central diabetes insipidus. Though therapy with desmopressin cannot be recommended based on the results of a single case, the outcome presented here is intriguing and suggests that larger studies in such patients is warranted to assess the broader application of such an intervention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#195
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,865
of 92,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them