↓ Skip to main content

The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1394 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
676 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits
Published in
Nature, August 1994
DOI 10.1038/370519a0
Authors

Jeffrey W. Hedenquist, Jacob B. Lowenstern

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 659 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 19%
Student > Master 98 14%
Researcher 94 14%
Student > Bachelor 77 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 4%
Other 106 16%
Unknown 141 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 415 61%
Engineering 19 3%
Environmental Science 17 3%
Unspecified 14 2%
Physics and Astronomy 6 <1%
Other 26 4%
Unknown 179 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#70,414
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,182
of 20,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#125
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.