You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Big data of tree species distributions: how big and how good?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Forest Ecosystems, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40663-017-0120-0 |
Authors |
Josep M. Serra-Diaz, Brian J. Enquist, Brian Maitner, Cory Merow, Jens-C. Svenning |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 16% |
Denmark | 3 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 66% |
Scientists | 11 | 34% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 45 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 41 | 19% |
Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 48 | 22% |
Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,271,948
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#12
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,232
of 485,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.